adaptive test-time defense
Fast Adaptive Test-Time Defense with Robust Features
Singh, Anurag, Sabanayagam, Mahalakshmi, Muandet, Krikamol, Ghoshdastidar, Debarghya
Adaptive test-time defenses are used to improve the robustness of deep neural networks to adversarial examples. However, existing methods significantly increase the inference time due to additional optimization on the model parameters or the input at test time. In this work, we propose a novel adaptive test-time defense strategy that is easy to integrate with any existing (robust) training procedure without additional test-time computation. Based on the notion of robustness of features that we present, the key idea is to project the trained models to the most robust feature space, thereby reducing the vulnerability to adversarial attacks in non-robust directions. We theoretically show that the top eigenspace of the feature matrix are more robust for a generalized additive model and support our argument for a large width neural network with the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) equivalence. We conduct extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets for several robustness benchmarks, including the state-of-the-art methods in RobustBench, and observe that the proposed method outperforms existing adaptive test-time defenses at much lower computation costs.
- Europe > Germany > Bavaria > Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Saarland > Saarbrücken (0.04)
Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Adaptive Test-time Defenses
Croce, Francesco, Gowal, Sven, Brunner, Thomas, Shelhamer, Evan, Hein, Matthias, Cemgil, Taylan
Adaptive defenses, which optimize at test time, promise to improve adversarial robustness. We categorize such adaptive test-time defenses, explain their potential benefits and drawbacks, and evaluate a representative variety of the latest adaptive defenses for image classification. Unfortunately, none significantly improve upon static defenses when subjected to our careful case study evaluation. Some even weaken the underlying static model while simultaneously increasing inference computation. While these results are disappointing, we still believe that adaptive test-time defenses are a promising avenue of research and, as such, we provide recommendations for their thorough evaluation. We extend the checklist of Carlini et al. (2019) by providing concrete steps specific to adaptive defenses.
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.14)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- (2 more...)